Assassination Of JFK Essays - Watergate Seven, United States Marines

Assassination of JFK On Friday, November 22nd 1963 at 12:30 P.M. the 35th president of the United States of America, John Fitzgerald Kennedy assassinated while he rode in an open limousine though the streets of Dallas. This event, which abruptly and severely altered the course of history, it has created more controversy than any other single event. Some haunting questions remain. "Who did it?" "Why did they do it?" "How was it done?" "Was there a cover up" The official answers complied by the Warren Commission have never satisfied the majority of the world's population. In this following essay I will try to show who was responsible for the assassination of John F. Kennedy. I believe the only way to prove that there was a cover up, is to firstly prove that Lee Harvey Oswald is not the killer. The Warren Commission consisting of "various outstanding citizens" was created to "ascertain, evaluate and report upon the facts relating to the assassination ... and the subsequent violent death of the man charged with the assassination Lee Harvey Oswald. The purpose of the Commission was to examine the evidence developed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and any additional evidence that may hereafter come to light ... to make such further investigation, as the Commission finds desirable. In less than one week, they found that a 'lone nut' killed JKF. At no time did the Warren Commission seem to consider the basic legal rights of Oswald - innocence until proven guilty, the right to legal representation, or the right to cross-examine witnesses and evidence against him. There is no way that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin. Firstly, the paraffin test of Oswald's hands and his right cheek conducted on November 23, 1963 has been positive for his hands but negative for his cheek. Generally, this is evidence in Oswald's favor, but the Commission asserted that the test "is completely unreliable in determining either whether a person has recently fired a weapon or whether he has not." Nobody saw Oswald on the sixth floor window after 11:55 on November 22nd. 90 seconds after the assassination, Roy Truly and Police officer M. L. Baker saw Oswald on the second floor. Oswald had to take the stairs down. But he had just 90 seconds to hide the rifle in the opposite corner of the sixth floor, run downstairs 4 floors passing Victoria Adam s who never saw him and reach the second floor where he was encountered to be "calm and collected". The Warren Commission claimed that Oswald fired three shots in 5.6 seconds from the sixth floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository. The first shot was the 'magic bullet' which made seven wounds on JFK and Connally. Which appeared later in the Parkland Memorial Hospital - you can see - in an almost pristine condition? The second shot missed JFK and hit a bystander in the cheek and the third was the fatal head. The Warren Commission said the third shot hit JFK from behind, however his head was pushed backwards and to the left. This means the bullet must of come from the grassy Knoll. In addition, many witnesses thought they heard shots from there. Oswald rifle's had poor capability (experts tried to do the same what Oswald was claimed to have done, but only one was able to do that! because he got not familiar with the rifle and the inaccurate attached scope of the rifle. It was near impossible for him to make the shot in 5.6 seconds. "If I had to pick one man in the whole United States to shoot me, I'd pick Oswald. I saw that man shoot and there's no way he could have ever learned to shoot well enough to do what they accused him of. I'm one of the best shots around, and I couldn't have done it." --Sherman Cooley (US Marine, served with Oswald) If Oswald was not the killer then who would have wanted to see President Kennedy dead? Lyndon Johnson (LBJ) The CIA J. Edgar Hoover The Mafia Anti-Castro Cubans Richard Nixon I am convinced Lyndon Johnson may very well have been involved in the plot to murder President Kennedy. I believe Johnson probably knew about the plot ahead of time and

Poverty in Down and Out in Paris and London and Conclusion of Walden written by George Orwell and Henry David Thoreau

Poverty in Down and Out in Paris and London and Conclusion of Walden written by George Orwell and Henry David Thoreau Poverty is a state of having little or no money and few or no material possessions. In Down and Out in Paris and London and ‚“Conclusion‚” of Walden written by George Orwell and Henry David Thoreau, respectively, both works offer perspectives on life of poverty. In addition, both authors have agreed that there are some advantages about being poor.First of all, both authors believe that it will be less worry with less money you have. For example, Orwell says on page 20 that ‚“within certain limits, it is actually true that the less money you have, the less you worry.‚” Orwell believes that a person doesn‚t need to worry that much things which are related to money. Similarly, Thoreau says, ‚“Superfluous wealth can buy superfluities only. Money is not required to buy one necessary of the soul.‚” Thoreau‚s belief is that a man with a lot of money could only by something that is buyable, but it can not buy the happiness or soul of a person.English: Signature of author Henry David ThoreauHe also means that a person‚s happiness or soul is important than everything in the world. It is not a thing that could be bought by money.Moreover, Orwell thinks that the poverty is a ‚“feeling of relief, almost of pleasure, at knowing yourself at last genuinely down and out‚” (20). At this point, Orwell feels free when he has no money. He feels happy and freedom because he has nothing to worry about anymore. Nothing can trap him anymore. In addition, Thoreau also says some thing that is similar to Orwell‚s feeling. Thoreau thinks that a person may have some ‚“pleasant‚”, ‚“thrilling‚”, ‚“glorious‚” hours, even in a poorhouse. That person may not have a lot of money, but that person can have a lot of happiness in his house. That...

Organisational Managment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words

Organisational Managment - Essay Example This paper approves that in the present times, organizations are doing their utmost in order to know more and more about their valued customers and stakeholders. For this, they have devised certain strategies which are in line with the values that their business has set for itself. These values are thus deeply intrinsic within the mission and vision statements of the company. In order to gain further knowledge about the customers, research is being given proper emphasis which would eventually discern the exact basis for the customers to come and make that vital purchase. It is a fact that the business world of present times can have a lot of improvement within their ranks if they adopt the policy of working towards the establishment of a performance management system. This would guarantee them a lot of success as their employees and workers would dedicate their whole hearted efforts towards the well being of the company as well as towards their own individual capacities. This essay makes a conclusion that the usefulness of its resources can only be harnessed when there is a decent enough endeavor to understand the dynamics of the market, the overall industry and more than anything else, the stakeholders who have invested huge sums of money within the realms of the organization and last but not the least the customers themselves for which the company strives to run a business in the first place and without whom the organization will not even be what it is in current state. With attention paid on getting things done in the textbook manner, the organizational gurus must ensure that learning is being used upon with case studies and recent examples to document their efforts.